"The Franciscan and grey friars
came up under the Emperor Frederick II., at
the time St Elizabeth was
canonized, in the year 1207. Francis worked his
gameÖtwelve years under the
emperor Frederick II.
There had been so many of those grey friars, that
they offered to send forty
thousand of their number against the Turks, and yet
leave their monasteries
sufficiently provided for."
Widows and "grey" friars are references to the
Inquisition.
"In 1224 the Constitution of Lombardy formally enacted sentence of death
for
heresy, and the next Pope, Gregory IX, endorsed
this penalty and founded
what is commonly called the Inquisition. Heretics were
to be handed over to
the secular arm for
"adequate punishment" -- of which we find the definition
in the words I quoted
from Innocent III -- and, as bishops had
shown
themselves very remiss in the nasty work of seeking out heretics, the
Pope took
the job from them and entrusted it to the tender
mercies of the
newly founded Dominican and Franciscan friars, who took to it
like
blood-hounds to a scent. Among the wits of
the time the Dominicans were known
as the Domini canes, "the hounds of the
Lord," a very neat Latin pun on their
name."
As in the previous three verses, the final verse begins with an acknowledgment,
a realization, of personal error. The penalty of death for heresy (which
created "widows") first came about under the reign of Frederick II.
"Frederick II persecuted no man for his belief. He had his hands full
persecuting rebels and heretics for their unbelief. It is illogical to argue
that toleration of other
genera
should involve a toleration of
degenerates
--for heretics were degenerates in Frederick's eyes--who rent the "coat without
seam" and tore asunder the unity of the state. The contradiction lies not with
the Emperor, but in the failure to recognise that heretics were for Frederick
enemies of the State, much more than enemies of religion. The misunderstanding
is based secondly on a false and arbitrary application of post-Reformation
ideas of toleration originating in the days when Protestantism was an
independent religion and included sectaries. The misapplication of these ideas
to Frederick in his relations with sectaries and non-Christians, is all the
more dangerous as it tempts to false generalisations about Frederick's
character, representing him as an enlightened and tolerant potentate--an
artificial picture that does not fit the facts.
In regards to his personal inclinations--especially wherever the sanctities of
the state were at stake--Frederick was in fact probably the most intolerant
Emperor that ever the West begot. No Emperor was ever, both in claim and in
act, so uncompromisingly the
JUDGE
as Frederick II. As judge he lived for centuries in the memories of men, as
judge they awaited his second coming as the avenger of human degeneracy. A
tolerant judge is like luke-warm fire.
The Emperor, who felt no hate to the non-Christian, showed himself in every
deed a 'Jealous God' towards rebels and heretics, offenders against the Deity
Justitia
and the sanctified order of the State ; a very fanatic obsessed by a primeval
hate that pursued its victims remorselessly to the second and third generation.
The most appaling punishments seemed too mild for such offenders. The edict
against those heretics who--to quote the Emperor--called themselves 'Sufferers'
Patarenes, after the 'passion' of the heroic martyrs, closes with a
blood-curdling taunt : 'We therefore command by this our law that these
accursed 'Sufferers' shall in fact suffer the passion of that death they lust
for : that they be condemned to the flames and burnt alive in the sight of all
men ; nor shall we regret that we thus fulfil their own desire."
- Frederick II
by Ernst Kantorowicz
(p. 269-70)
"He played the role as if he were utterly conscious of being the legitimate
heir to the title of Roman Emperor, and that
his right was God given. He
behaved and judged any different opinion accordingly: as blasphemy and
rebellion
against the will of God. He coolly used the Medieval "Fear of God"
for his own agenda which was to found a "Universal
Planetary Global
Institution" above kingdoms and nations which were to keep their secular power
and cultural identity,
but would belong to the superior set of scopes of the
Empire.
In order to build up the "ideological" value of the title he was very generous
with any material advantages. The
generosity of Frederick was without limits;
equally unlimited was the severity with which he judged and punished
any
attempt to diminish it or, God forbid, any rebellion.
The heretics were "rebels" because they did not acknowledge the God that had
given him the title and the Imperial
responsibility. Political rebels were
treated with the same drastic justice since they were "blasphemous": An
attack
against the Emperor was an attack against God who had granted the
title. Laesa majestate was a crime against God
not against the person of the
Emperor. Thus death was the only possible punishment and there was no lenience.
But let us not make any mistake about Frederick's "religion" or "piety": On
account of his pragmatic attitude he
promoted his specific "planetary vision"
with the concept of "God given right" much more consistent and
understandable
to the Medieval culture that was the reality of the time.
Of course, this is my "inferred" opinion and I have no historical document to
support it. But Frederick's whole life was
consistent with this assumption:
his staunch opposition to the Papacy (and the staunch opposition of the Popes
to
him), the many anecdotes that report his sarcastic attitude against
religious bigotry and gullibility. It was his firm
conviction that you must
believe in what you witness for yourself (see with your own eyes) and not in
what you hear
from others."
"Growing up under the arrogant rule of Innocent III, who
never seems to have
realized that his ward had come of age, he developed a
humorous evasiveness."
- H. G. Wells, The Outline of History
"Frederick was supposed to have jested that
Moses, Christ, and
Muhammad were three impostors who had themselves
been
hoodwinked."
"His sense of humor was notorious, and his jests and
his skeptical quips are
authentically called the forerunner of the humanistic, scientific temper
of
centuries later; making a vivid contrast with the narrow, illiberal, crude
courts of Europe
of that time. He rebelled openly against the pope, even
starting an expedition against Rome,
saying that the Church was at the time
corrupted with great wealth. Legends grew around him, and
he shed lustre upon
the name of Hohenstaufen, already a name to conjure with."
The "wise men share a joke" alludes to two books of the 13th century, the
Book of the Gentile and the Three Wise Men
by Catalan mystic and poet Ramon Llull and to a book alleged to have been
written by Frederick II,
The Three Impostors
. Ramon Llull's "three wise men" are a Jew, a Christian and a Saracen who
attempt to persuade a non-believer of the existence of God. The "three
impostors" are a Jew, a Christian and a Saracen (Moses, Jesus and Mohammed) and
the author of the
The Three Impostors
attempts to persuade the reader of the "hoax" of Judaism, Christianity and
Islam.
The Book of the Gentile and the Three Wise Men
or Three
Lllull
-abies
"In 1274 Ramon Llull wrote, in Arabic, the Book of the Gentile and the Three
Wise Men. This book is "Llullís most important
apologetic and polemical
work,". The book narrates the story of a Gentile, deeply agonized by his
inescapable certainty of death and hopelessness for
anything more, who meets a
group of theologians, one a Jew, one a Christian, and one a Saracen. (The term
"Gentiles," as also in
Aquinasí Summa contra Gentiles, signified those
"without religion," in Llullís words, including "Mongols, Tartars,
Bulgars,
Hungarians from Lesser Hungary, Kumans, Nestorians, Ghanians, and
many others.") The theologians persuade the Gentile of
the existence of God
and the fact of the resurrection by use of Llullís Art in a popularized form."
"He produced his formidable Art
Abreujada d 'Atrobar Veritat (The Art of
Finding Truth), written in Catalan and translated into Latin. Synthesizing
the
instrumental logic of al-Ghazzali, the geometrical symbolism of the
Kabbalah, and the trinitarian perspective of
Platonic Christianity, Lull
developed an algebraic and analogical method for demonstrating spiritual
and
philosophical truths. Recognizing that Deity is in itself unknowable and
utterly unmanifest, like the Ain Soph of the
Kabbalah, he held that divine
manifestation begins with nine Dignities or attributes of God. These correspond
to
the Sephiroth of the Kabbalistic Tree of Life and the hadras (dignities and
divine names) of Islam, especially as
developed by ibn Massara and al-'Arabi.
By presenting them in his Ars Combinatoria, the fundamental Dignities
could be
combined with relative predicates with mathematical precision. Showing that
some combinations are
possible whilst others are not, Lull believed that he
could begin on the common ground of Christianity, Islam and
Judaism, and thus
lead all honest thinkers to the Christian perspective."
The Connection Between Raimon Llull and Frederick II
"The culture of Frederick II's court in Sicily and Apulia belongs to that
culture of the 'Three Rings' which has become familiar to the public of more
recent centuries through the parable of the rings in Lessing's Nathan the Wise.
Frederick's remark about the three great impostors, Moses, Christ and Mohammed,
was familiar currency in this Mediterranean culture which stretched from
Baghdad to Toledo. It expressed in negative form the fact of a fruitful
coexistence between Jewish, Islamic and Christian culture."
- The Holy Roman Empire
by Friedrich Heer (p. 81)
"The next stage of the new universalist rationalist thought was Latin ñ in
Majorca with RamÛn
Llull, in Sicily with
Frederick II and
the first Thomas Aquinas, and
in Paris with the "Latin Averroists"
(Siger of
Brabant, BoËce of Daclus and so on) and Saint Thomas
Aquinas, a scholar in every
field and
especially in technical subjects (navigation for example),
offered a scrupulously balanced vision of the arguments used by
the three monotheistic religions, a vision in which
the affirmation
of convergence between reason
and revelation provided the basis
for dogmatics
without dogmatism, such as may be found in the
allegory of the Gentile and the three Wise Men."
"The eclectic and universalist vision (ecumenical on the religious plane) of
Pico embraces ancient philosophies, religions and Christian theology. It
encompassed, like Ficino, not only the ancient sages, but also the thinkers of
Islam, all of the magical tradition and, above all, the Jewish Kabbalah. This
vision finds its last origin near the Sicilian Court of Frederick II, where
Saracen, Hebrew, representatives of the Greek ideal and Christian philosophers
had taken to discuss between them the universal idea of one religion, revealed
for all people. This idea will find metaphysical foundation in the humanistic
doctrine of the immanence of the divinity in the universe."
"However, the end of that "route" (al-Andalus),
which petered out at the close
of the twelfth
century in the Muslim world and at the close of the
thirteenth or beginning of the fourteenth century in the Christian
world, marked the beginning of a period of intellectual
decline. In
the fourteenth and early fifteenth
centuries, Ibn Khaldun fought a
solitary and
desperate battle to rebuild the lost unity of the
Maghrib. At the end of the thirteenth century, Etienne Tempierís
condemnation of the views of both AverroÎs and Saint Thomas
Aquinas, together with the extermination of
Frederick IIís
descendants and the destruction
of his intellectual legacy in
Sicily, ushered in
a period of decadence ...which lasted until the
Reformation at the end of the fifteenth century."
"Etienne Gilson, the noted student of medieval philosophy and history, reminds
us that
Bishop Etienne Tempier wrote a condemnation of the phrase, "Theology
rests upon fables," in
the 1277 condemnation of 219 propositions attributed to
the theories of Siger of Brabant.
Gilson also notes that Fontenelle's History
of the Oracles (1687) suggested that Revelation is
mythical in origin. Gilson
adds, "Fontenelle was a very prudent man; he was merely suggesting
what he had
in mind; but four centuries before him some Averroists had clearly said it."
"Averrhoism quickly penetrated into the University of
Paris and was adopted by
some of the foremost thinkers of the day. The Emperor Frederick II
openly
espoused it and was excommunicated from the Church as a result."